帮忙写篇英语作文Bansmokinginpublicplac-查字典问答网
分类选择

来自李弢的问题

  帮忙写篇英语作文Bansmokinginpublicplaces赞成1、有害健康,导致疾病.2、3123

  帮忙写篇英语作文Bansmokinginpublicplaces

  赞成1、有害健康,导致疾病.2、3123

1回答
2019-04-10 03:12
我要回答
请先登录
段学明

  禁止在公共场所吸烟(NoSmokinginAllPublicPlaces)

  Somebusinessesnowsaythataoonecallsmokecigarettesinanyoftheiroffices.Somegovernmentshavebannedsmokinginallpublicplaces.Thisisagoodideathoughittakesawaysomeofourfreedom.

  Asweknow,smokingisharmfulnotonlytoourhealthbutalsototheenvironment.Smokingcanleadtomanydiseases,suchaslungcancer.Smokingaffectsnonsmokersmorethanitdoessmokers.Ratioofpassivesmokersgettingillishigherthanthatofsmokers.So,manynonsmokersareagainstsmoking.

  Inpublicplaces,theharmofsmokingisgreater.Thisisconnectedwithanothereffectofsmoking.Thatis,smokingpollutesenvironmentbygivingmuchpoisonousvapouroffintotheair.

  Therefore,thatthegovernmentbansmokingisverynecessaryandimportanttous.Itisameasuretoprotectourhealthandenvironment.Somanypeople,especiallynonsmokersareforthepolicy.

  Somepeoplesaythatittakesawaysomeofourfreedom.Ithinkitisaone-sidedview.Ifonewantstosmoke,hemaysmokeinprivate,notinthepublicplaces.Infact,smokersstillhavethefreedomofsmoking.

  But,Ithink,smokershadbettergiveupsmoking,notonlyinprivateplaces,butalsointhepublicplaces,everywhere.Itwillbebeneficialtoailofus.

  [参考译文]

  禁止在公共场所吸烟

  现在,有些单位宣称没有人可以在他们的办公室里吸烟.有些国家已禁止在公共场所吸烟,这种做法很好,尽管它剥夺了我们一些自由.正如我们所知道的,吸烟不仅对环境环境不利而且对环境环境也不利.吸烟会导致多种疾病,例如:肺癌.烟气对不吸烟者的影响有甚于对吸烟者本人的影响.被动吸烟比吸烟人患病率要高.所以很多不吸烟的人反对吸烟.

  在公共场合吸烟危害更大,这是吸烟产生的另外一种影响.那就是,吸烟所产生的大量有害气体会污染环境环境.因此,政府禁烟对我们来说是非常必要的和重要的.这是保护人类环境环境和环境环境的一个办法.所以有许多人,尤其是不吸烟的都赞同这一政策.

  有些人说这会剥夺我们的一些自由.我认为这样的观点是片面的.如果某人想抽烟,可以在私人场合抽烟而不是在公共场合.实际上,烟民仍然有吸烟的自由.不过,我认为不仅仅是私下里,而且,在公共场合,在任何地方烟民最好放弃抽烟.这会有益于每个人.

  Notallowingsmokinginpublicplacesandofficebuildingisaverygoodrule.Ibelievethisforseveralreasons.Notonlywillbanningsmokingimprovepeople’shealth,itwillalsoincreaseworkerproductivityandreduceconflicts.

  weallknowsmokingisnothealthy.Unfortunately,whensmokersareabletosmokeinpublicbuildings,theycanmakeotherpeoplesick.Theymayworkwithpeoplewhoareallergictosmoking,forexamples.Inthatcase,thenon-smokershavenochoiceunlesstheywanttoquittheirjobs.Theycanonlygetsicker,whichisunfair.Ofcourse,banningsmokinginpublicbuildingsandofficeswillpleasenon-smokers.Itwillalsoimprovethesmokers’health.Theywillhavefeweropportunitiestosmoke,sotheywillsmokefewercigarettes.

  Banningsmokinginofficebuildingscanalsoincreaseworkerproductivity.Smokerswon’tinterrupttheirworkallthetimetosmoke.Therewillalsobefewerworkerabsences.Whensmokerscutdownthenumberofcigarettes,theywillgetfewersmokingrelatedillnesses.

  Finally,itisagoodideatobansmokinginpublicplacesandofficebuildingsbecauseabancanreduceconflicts.Non-smokerstendtogetannoyedandjealousbecausesmokershaveanexcusetotakefrequentbreaks.Themostsignificantconflict,however,isoverwhethersmokershavearighttosmokeinpublic.Aswehavealreadyseen,non-smokersfeeltheyarenotalwaysgivenachoice.Ifsmokinginpublicisallowed,theywillbeforcedtobreatheharmfulair.Thismayviolatetheirrights,andnon-smokersareangrywithsmokersbecauseofit.

  Itseemsclearthatbannings

2019-04-10 03:16:53

最新问答

推荐文章

猜你喜欢

附近的人在看

推荐阅读

拓展阅读

  • 大家都在看
  • 小编推荐
  • 猜你喜欢
  •