Shouldthecreationofaperfecthumanbethegoalofhumanity
Althoughisverytemptingtousethebio-technologywehavetocreata'perfect'human,itisshortsightedanddangerous.Applicationoftechnologyshouldhaveboundaryandgoalofhumanitycannotbeaboutcreatingaperfecthuman.
Thefirstquestiontoaskiswhat'perfect'meansandwhoshouldhavetheauthoritytosetthestandard.Suchconceptrequirescarefulethicalscrutiny.Otherwiseitcouldbecomeaslipperyslopetowardeugenicsorevengenocide.
Themostconvincingarguementtomakegeneticimprovementisthehealthandhumanitarianbenefit.Thesupportersofthisargumentsaythatifwecanmakeperfecthumans,wecanreducesufferingfromdiseasesorillness.Itcouldbeshortsightedinthesensethatthelong-termconsequenceofcertaintechniqueswouldnotbeknownuntilitistoolate.Seriousside-effectsthatwouldnotsurfaceuntil10or20yearsorevenlongertimeframecouldresultnoaperfecthumanbutthreatofexistanceofhumanityasweknowit.