【英语翻译EvenmorefundamentaltotheinterpretationoftheLienAct,theCourtdidnotseeanyconflictbetweenthesec.788denialofliensandtheSAAprovisionallowingcasesbroughtoninremtheoriestogoforwardinpersonam.Itspecificallya】

　　英语翻译

　　EvenmorefundamentaltotheinterpretationoftheLienAct,theCourtdidnotseeanyconflictbetweenthesec.788denialofliensandtheSAAprovisionallowingcasesbroughtoninremtheoriestogoforwardinpersonam.Itspecificallyaddressedtheproblemstating:

　　AstheCircuitCourtofAppealsapparentlyholdsthattheActdoesnotauthorizerecoveryonprinciplesofinremliabilitybecauseofthestatutorydenialofamaritimelien,weturntotheconsiderationofthisholdingAlthoughthePublicVesselsActdoesnothaveasimilarprovision[totheSAAwhichallowsalibelanttoproceedinaccordancewithlibelsinrem],2ofthePublicVesselsActexpresslyprovidesthat'suitsshallbesubjecttoandproceedinaccordancewiththeprovision'oftheSuitsinAdmiraltyAct,'insofarasthesamearenotinconsistent'withtheprovisionsofthePublicVesselsAct.SincethereisnothinginthePublicVesselsActthatisinconsistentwiththisprovisionoftheSuitsinAdmiraltyAct,weholdthattheincorporationclauseapplies.107

　　Whilenotingtheideathatnoliensexistagainstapublicvessel,theSupremeCourtnonethelessfoundthatthisclausehadnoeffectontheability[*20]ofplaintiffstobringclaimsoninremtheories.108TheCourtfoundfurthersupportforthispositionintheuseoftheterm"inadmiralty"inthePVAandthegeneralhistorysurroundingtheactindicatingthatCongress'sonlyintentionwastoensurethatpublicvesselswouldnotbearrested.109Thus,thePVAandtheSAAbothallowactionsbasedoninremliabilityprinciplestobebroughtagainstthegovernmentinpersonam.

　　Thisinterpretationhasstoodforthelastsixtyyearsandwasreiteratedrecentlybythe11thCircuitCourtofAppealsinStevensTechnical.110InthatcaseasubcontractorsuedthegovernmentinpersonamfornecessariesithadprovidedtotheshipundertheolderversionoftheLienAct.Thegovernmentcontendedthatbecausepublicvesselscannotbeseized,nocauseofactiononaninremprinciplemaybebrought.Thecourtrejectedthisargument.FollowingsimilarreasoningtoCanadianAviator,itfoundthatthe"nolien"clauseensuredthatthattherecouldbenoarrestorseizureofapublicvessel,butdidnottakeawaytheplaintiff'sinpersonamcauseofactionagainstthegovernment.111