Recently,theBeijingMunicipalgovernmentreleasedapolicyproposalsayingthatprivatecarsshouldbelimitedinordertobetterthecurrentsituationoftraffic.Itrapidlybecomesapopsocialdebateonceproposed.Agreatnumberofobserversandresidentsarguedthatthepolicylimitingonprivatecarsiscarelessandunconsidered.Inthefirstplace,thepolicydamagesthepropertyrightsofcarowners,ignoringtheirproperbenefits.ItsureleadstotheconfusingfeelingofthosecarownersinBeijingwhopurposedtheircarsthroughrightfulwaybutcan’tusethemfreelyundertherangeoflaw.Viewedfromangle,thecarowners’rejectionisreasonable.Secondly,thepolicymayhavealargenegativeinfluenceonautomobileindustry.Theimplementingoflimitingprivatecarsmayreducepeople’spassionaboutautomobileandthengiveastriketothehealthydevelopmentofautomobileindustrywhichisnotonlysuitablefortheglobalizationtendencybutalsoharmforthelocaleconomy.Tobehonest,Beijing’strafficsituationisimprovedafterpolicytaken.Alotofcitizenresponsethattherearefewertrafficjamsandaccidentsindeedandtheairconditionismuchbetterthanbefore.However,atemporary,effectivepolicyisnotenough.Whatwereallyneedisascientific,long-termandhumanisticpolicy.Formthispointofview,therearestillalotofothermeasurescanbeusedbygovernmentavoidinghurtingtheprivatecarsownersbenefitssuchasimprovingthecityroadsprogramandprovidingmorecomfortablepublictransportation(bus,railwayandsoon).Moreover,themostsignificantthinggovernmentshoulddoistoraisethecitizen’sconsciousnessabouturbanconstructionandprotection