Thewordfreedomimpliesanindividualisunfetteredinanymannertoact.Freedomimpliesnoboundariestolimithumanactions.

　　Theconceptofboundaries,however,transformsthewordfreedomintothewordliberty.Whereastheconceptoffreedomignorestheconceptofobligations,theconceptoflibertyimpliespotential

　　obligations.Thewordfreedomignoresinteractionswithotherhumans,

　　thewordlibertyacknowledgesthoseinteractions.Thewordliberty

　　describesspecificfreedomsofactionwithoutobligationstowardothers,

　　butrecognizesthatobligationsmightexist.Theconceptofboundaries

　　introducesobligationstowardotherpeople.Theconceptoffreedom

　　impliesunrestrictedmovementandactionsregardlessofboundaries,but

　　theconceptoflibertyimplyrestrictionsonactionsbecauseofboundaries.Libertyacknowledgespossibleboundariesandmerelyisfreedomfromfiatboundaries.

　　Thereisanotherwordthatdescribestheconceptofliberty.Anarchy.

　　The鈥淎鈥word.Awordthattypicallyinstillsdiscomfortanduneasiness

　　intothemindsofmany.Awordthatmanypeopletodaycarelesslyuseto

　　implybomb-throwing,unlimitedboundaries,chaos,anddisorder.What

　　exactlyisanarchy?

　　Astraightforwarddefinitionofanarchymeans鈥渨ithoutrulers.鈥Forexample,monarchyisthe鈥渁rchy鈥orruleofone,oligarchyistheruleofafew,hierarchyisalayeredrule;thusanarchyistheruleofnone.

　　AlthoughtheWebster鈥檚definitionincludesthe鈥渓ackof...government,鈥suchadefinitionismisleadingwithoutdefiningthewordgovernment.

　　Ifgovernmentmeansacentralizedorganizationofpeoplecommonlyknown

　　asthenation-stateoranyotherformofexternaldictatorial

　　regulationofhumanaction,thenWebster鈥檚definitioniscorrect.However,ifthewordgovernmentreferstotheprocessthatisanaturalandnormaloutgrowthofpeopleforminggroupsandsocieties,thenWebster鈥檚definitionismisleading.

　　Anarchydoesnotmeanwithoutrules,butisaphilosophyandsocialsystemwithoutrulers.Somepeopleincorrectlydefineanarchyasnorulesorboundaries,but

　　thatmostcertainlywouldbeaworldofchaosandconfusion.The

　　distinctionbetweenrulesandrulersisimportant.Likewise,anarchy

　　doesnotmeanasocialsystemwithoutleaders.Inanygroupofpeople

　　certainindividualswillexhibitordemonstratespecialoruniqueskills

　　andabilitiestoleadothersandtocoordinateindividualactions.

　　Thus,anarchyisnotbarbarism.AnarchyisnotUtopianoridealisticbut

　　arealisticlogicalconclusiontotheprinciplesofselfandtrespass.

　　Trespassisanyviolationofanindividual鈥檚bodyorresources.

　　Bydefinition,trespassincludesthethreatofviolation.Anarchydoes

　　notnecessarilyprohibitself-defense,butprohibitsinitiatingtrespass.Manyphilosophicalanarchistsbelievethatanyself-defensemustbeproportionaltostoppingthetrespass.

　　Becauseanarchyisasocialsystemwithoutrulers,thatphilosophyisdiametricallyopposedtothephilosophyofstatism.Statismisanideologyembracingcentralizedrule,encouragingtop-downdictatoriallaw,andembracingapolicyorbeliefofusingforceandco